New Everyday Misinformation Project study: The Trustworthiness of Peers and Public Discourse: Exploring How People Navigate Numerical Dis/misinformation on Personal Messaging Platforms

New Everyday Misinformation Project study: The Trustworthiness of Peers and Public Discourse: Exploring How People Navigate Numerical Dis/misinformation on Personal Messaging Platforms

Numbers have unique power in public discourse but have often been used in misleading ways. There is a long history of spurious numerical claims about climate change, public health, and immigration. Poor objective and subjective numeracy also mean many people struggle to judge statistics. Using data from our in-depth, longitudinal qualitative fieldwork, in our new article we explore how people gauge the trustworthiness of numerical dis- and misinformation on personal messaging platforms.

Read More

New Article: Online Misinformation and Everyday Ontological Narratives of Social Distinction

New Article: Online Misinformation and Everyday Ontological Narratives of Social Distinction

Most research into online misinformation has investigated its direct effects—the impact it may have on citizens’ beliefs and behaviour. Much less attention has been paid to how citizens themselves make sense of misinformation as a broader social problem, even though such attitudes are likely to shape how people respond to anti-misinformation interventions.

In this article we integrated some select theories of narrative, identity, cultural capital, and social distinction to examine how people construct the problem of misinformation and their orientation to it.

Hot off the press… the latest publication from the Everyday Misinformation Project, out now in Media, Culture & Society.

Read More

New Study: Misinformation Rules!? Could “Group Rules” Reduce Misinformation in Online Personal Messaging?

New Study: Misinformation Rules!? Could “Group Rules” Reduce Misinformation in Online Personal Messaging?

This is the latest research article from the Everyday Misinformation Project that I’m leading. The project, which is funded by the Leverhulme trust, began in April 2021 and runs until March 2024.

For this piece, we explored a previously-unexamined practice our fieldwork uncovered: when users create “group rules” to prevent misinformation entering their everyday interactions.

Read More

New Study—The Campaign Disinformation Divide: Believing and Sharing News in the 2019 UK General Election

New Study—The Campaign Disinformation Divide: Believing and Sharing News in the 2019 UK General Election

For this study, we were interested in testing whether the different kinds of news diets people consume might differentially equip them to discern between true and false news. We also wanted to examine whether there were any connections between discerning true and false news and sharing those types of news on social media. The findings revealed a campaign disinformation divide.

Read More

New study—finally published, in all its typeset glory, at American Behavioral Scientist!

New study—finally published, in all its typeset glory, at American Behavioral Scientist!

We developed an affordances-based conceptual framework to distinguish between platforms, and we narrowed news sharing behaviour down to amplification of false and exaggerated news. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show empirically a connection between Instagram use and the amplification of misleading information among ordinary social media users. A publication accepted in early 2021 and delayed by the impact of the pandemic, it’s great to see this out, in all its typeset glory, at this venerable interdisciplinary journal.

Read More

Presenting at the American Sociological Association's Communication, Information Technologies, and Media Sociology Section Annual Symposium

The Everyday Misinformation Project team will be presenting its latest findings at the American Sociological Association (ASA) Media Sociology Symposium on August 4.

Our talk is entitled ‘“I Would Always be Careful About What I Receive”: Online Misinformation, Epistemic Norms, and Social Distinction,’ and is by Natalie-Anne Hall, Andrew Chadwick and Cristian Vaccari.

In this latest study from the project, based on a thematic analysis of longitudinal, in-depth interview data (N=182) we reveal some key epistemic norms governing the everyday consumption and sharing of information and the social distinctions these norms establish. In the qualitative phase of our fieldwork, many participants who said they did not frequently encounter misinformation through personal messaging were well aware of its existence, and willingly expressed views about those they believed were taken in by it. Deception was presented as a problem experienced by others who are more “naïve,” “biased,” or less “media literate” than themselves. These narratives reflect a keen awareness of the normative epistemic value placed on objectivity and media literacy in today’s societies. However, they simultaneously reveal that those making such social distinctions are less likely to value anti-misinformation interventions because they are deemed irrelevant to their individual everyday practices. This conflicts with the reality that addressing misinformation must inevitably be a collective and inclusive social endeavour.

The symposium will be held virtually, and our session will be at 10am PDT, which is 6pm BST. Registration details and the programme can be found here.

On the Social Media and Politics Podcast discussing the new public report on Covid Vaccine Misinformation and Personal Messaging

On the Social Media and Politics Podcast discussing the new public report on Covid Vaccine Misinformation and Personal Messaging

Last week I appeared on the Social Media and Politics Podcast to talk about the new public report Covid Vaccine Misinformation and Personal Messaging: The Challenge of Challenging Everyday Misinformation. We had a wide ranging discussion covering the hybrid character of this engagement, the role of qualitative research in project designs, and the importance of person-centred solutions to countering online misinformation.

Read More

New Public Report: Covid Vaccines and Online Personal Messaging: The Challenge of Challenging Everyday Misinformation

New Public Report: Covid Vaccines and Online Personal Messaging: The Challenge of Challenging Everyday Misinformation

Today we publish the first public report from the Everyday Misinformation Project. Covid Vaccines and Online Personal Messaging: The Challenge of Challenging Everyday Misinformation uncovers the social norms that shape whether and how people do or do not challenge misinformation about Covid vaccines on personal messaging platforms such as WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger.

Read More

Guest Post: Rasmus Kleis Nielsen and Sarah Anne Ganter on their new book The Power of Platforms

Guest Post: Rasmus Kleis Nielsen and Sarah Anne Ganter on their new book The Power of Platforms

In the latest Guest Post by authors from the Oxford Studies in Digital Politics series, Rasmus Kleis Nielsen (Reuters Institute, Oxford University) and Sarah Anne Ganter (School of Communication, Simon Fraser University) write about their new book The Power of Platforms: Shaping Media and Society. Out now.

Read More