Latest News
Three new journal articles and a public report from O3C’s Leverhulme-funded project Understanding the Everyday Sharing of Misinformation are hot off the press:
Hall, N-A., Hall, N-A., Chadwick, A., Vaccari, C., Lawson, B., & Akolgo, P. (2024). Research Update: Misinformation on Personal Messaging—Are WhatsApp’s Warnings Effective? Online Civic Culture Centre, Loughborough University. 28pp. (Press release) (Download pdf).
Chadwick, A., Hall, N-A., & Vaccari, C. (2023). Misinformation Rules!? Could “Group Rules” Reduce Misinformation in Online Personal Messaging? New Media & Society. (Download pdf).
Hall, N-A., Chadwick, A., & Vaccari, C. (2023). Online Misinformation and Everyday Ontological Narratives of Social Distinction. Media, Culture & Society. (Download pdf).
Chadwick, A., Vaccari, C., & Hall, N-A. (2023). What Explains the Spread of Misinformation in Online Personal Messaging Networks? Exploring the Role of Conflict Avoidance. Digital Journalism. (Download pdf).
I’m a member of the new interdisciplinary Social Media and Health Research Network at the University of Birmingham, convened by Dr Anna Lavis.
During the 2024 UK general election campaign I worked with the Investigations team at ABC News to provide data analysis and contextual commentary in the week leading up to the broadcaster's scoop uncovering a coordinated foreign disinformation campaign targeting UK citizens on Facebook. The investigation resulted in statements by former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and former Deputy Prime Minister Oliver Dowden and an ongoing investigation by the National Security Online Information Team in the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. The revelations featured on the front page of The Sunday Times and in further follow-up stories in The Times, the Daily Mail, Sky News, the Independent, and the Evening Standard, among several other outlets. After publication of ABC's article, Meta issued a statement saying it had taken down the pages and their paid advertisements for “inauthentic behaviour deceiving people.” I was later interviewed by Germany’s main public news organization ARD-aktuell about my own further cross-platform investigation, which found that the racist, anti-immigrant accounts in the disinformation network on Facebook were also active on X/Twitter and targeting the UK and French elections.
I was interviewed by PoliticsHome, AFP, and the Daily Mail about social media and digital communication during the 2024 UK General Election campaign, and wrote a fun article for the Daily Mail dissecting the memes in UK parties’ TikTok campaigns.
I served on the selection panel for the American Political Science Association’s Information Technology and Politics Best Book Award 2024. The winner is Alice E. Marwick’s The Private is Political: Networked Privacy and Social Media (Yale University Press).
Catherine R. Baker and I have a chapter, ‘Corrupted Infrastructures of Meaning: Post-truth Identities Online,’ out in Howard Tumber and Silvio Waisbord’s edited volume, Routledge Companion to Media Disinformation and Populism, which has just newly published in paperback.
The latest three titles in my book series Oxford Studies in Digital Politics are Stephen R. Barnard (2024) Hacking Hybrid Media: Power and Practice in an Age of Manipulation; Robert Gorwa (2024) The Politics of Platform Regulation: How Governments Shape Online Content Moderation; and Mohamed Zayani and Joe F. Khalil (2024) The Digital Double Bind: Change and Stasis in the Middle East. More details here.
I gave a talk at the Cheltenham Science Festival in the panel Seeing is Deceiving: Deepfakes. AI ethics adviser “Eleanor Morgan” participated, though “Eleanor” was actually a deepfake that fooled quite a substantial section of the audience before the experiment’s educational “reveal” at the end of the session. The panelists and festival organisers collaborated in the months leading up to the session to create and script the deepfake participant.
In the latest UK Research Excellence Framework (2021), Communication and Media at Loughborough was ranked 5th in the UK and submitted 40 full-time staff. Overall, 92% of its research was ranked in the two highest categories—'world leading' and 'internationally excellent'—with 65% ranked world leading: the highest possible award of 4 stars. Its research environment and research impact were each ranked joint 1st place in the UK, with the highest possible award of 100% 4-star quality.
[Page updated July, 2024]